Thrift Stores Scrap All Children’s Stock
By JIM HICKEY
At a time when the crumbling national economy is forcing many Vineyard families to seek bargains on kids’ clothing, toys and games, both Island thrift stores have been forced to throw away nearly their entire inventory of children’s items due to a new federal law designed to protect children from lead products.
Now any store found distributing children’s products containing lead would face thousands of dollars in fines — so the second-hand stores in Tisbury and Edgartown this week cleared their stores of children’s merchandise in dismay.
The law, called the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, was passed by Congress last year and signed into law by then-president George W. Bush after a wave of highly publicized tainted-toy recalls, many of which were aimed at toy manufacturers in China. It took effect on Feb. 10. The new rules ban lead content beyond minute levels of 600 parts per million in any product for children age 12 and younger. The law makes it illegal not only to manufacture lead-laced products, but also to sell or distribute them, no matter when the products were made.
Since many older products containing lead found in second-hand shops have never been tested, and because such stores cannot afford to test the items themselves, thrift stores and consignment shops across the nation have been forced to throw away a large section of their inventory to avoid fines levied by the federal government.
Both the Martha’s Vineyard Second Hand Store in Edgartown, run by the Island chapter of the Boys’ and Girls’ Club, and the Thrift Shop in Vineyard Haven, run by the Martha’s Vineyard Community Services, have been forced to throw away hundreds or perhaps thousands of children’s items with potentially lead-carrying zippers, buttons, painted fabrics or decals.
“We had to clear out the toys, the kids’ clothing, the dolls . . . everything had to go,” said Dolly Campbell, assistant manager of the Vineyard Haven Thrift Shop, painting a scene straight out of Dr. Seuss’s How the Grinch Stole Christmas. “I understand why they passed the law, but they didn’t think it out very well. Now we don’t have any toys or children’s clothing for families in need. What kind of sense does that make?”
Deborah Alpert-Sylvia, director of the Second Hand Store in Edgartown, picked up the theme.
“It’s sad and it’s disconcerting. I feel terrible for the customers that rely on our store. This [law] is frustrating, but it is especially upsetting now. People need these bargains now more than ever. The timing of this couldn’t have been worse,” she said.
The law as written not only prevents thrift stores from selling children’s items that contain lead, but it also makes it illegal to give those items away for free.
Mrs. Alpert-Sylvia said she just cleared most of the children’s items from her store earlier this week, although she confides she gave people one last opportunity to take certain items if they needed them. “I sort of told everyone, ‘Okay! I’m throwing this stuff out now! It’s going to be in the trash if anyone wants it!’” she said.
But the law has effectively forced the store to scrap almost its entire collection of children’s items. She said she plans to keep some items in storage, in hopes that she can put them out for the busy summer season if the law is amended.
“What’s next? Will we no longer be able to say hello to our neighbors? Does this law make the world a better place? I don’t think so,” she said.
Ms. Campbell said the law also means both stores can no longer accept most children’s items.
“People come in to drop stuff off and we tell them we can’t take it. We tell them we want to, but we can’t,” she said.
Ms. Campbell said store officials briefly considered simply ignoring the law and continuing to sell the items. But officials at the National Association of Resale and Thrift Shops (NARTS), which provides educational and professional development for thrift stores across the nation, advised them to heed the law or face the possibility of massive fines.
When contacted by the Gazette Wednesday, Adele R. Meyer, executive director for NARTS, said the new law has already done more harm than good.
“It’s so far-reaching and far-fetched it defies common sense. This was just a knee-jerk reaction about China, and it has already created more problems than it has solved,” Ms. Meyer said, adding:
“Families across the country are desperate now to find affordable children’s items; but instead we’re throwing millions of toys, books and kids’ clothing into out nation’s landfills.”
The new law may have other unintended consequences as well. For instance, it could force all books for children 12 and under held in public and school libraries to undergo testing for lead and other potential harmful substances. Last month, the Consumer Product Safety Commission granted a one-year stay of testing and certification requirements for books in libraries, although that stay does not apply to operations such as thrift stores.
The American Library Association is now asking librarians across the nation to wait a year while the association lobbies hard to exempt children’s books from the law.
Felicia Cheney, director of the Edgartown Public Library, said the new law could force the library to either undergo expensive testing or do away with many children’s books and toys.
“In theory it could force us to get rid of our entire children’s section. But right now we are just waiting to see what happens with the law. We’ve had to shut down our children’s section twice already, once because of mold and once because of [furnace problems]. Maybe the third time will be the charm,” she said.
The new law might also affect artisans and craftsmen who make children’s toys and jewelry. Mark Forrest, chief of staff and Cape and Islands liaison for U.S. Rep. William Delahunt, said complaints about the unintended effects of the law are now reaching the congressman’s office.
Mr. Forrest encouraged anyone with concerns about the new law to contact Mr. Delahunt’s office.
» Share Your Feedback
Reader Feedback
Friday, March 6, 2009 7:51am
Thank you for covering this ongoing story and the efforts of many diverse industries adversely affected by this poorly written legislation. The law now makes it illegal to even donate goods that have not been 'proven' to contain less than 600 ppm of lead, but to sell it in a yard sale, on eBay, Craigslist. It is impacting charities incomes and ability to fund their many worthwhile programs. Handmade artisans and crafters and work at home moms handmaking children's items are indeed affected severely by this law and many have closed or gone out of business. Please help us get Congress to listen. There are three bills in Congress, any one of which would help us but we need support shown for them in order to get them out of committee and on to the floor to vote. They are Senate bill S374, House Bill's 1027 and 968. Please call your local congressional representatives and show your support for them. Visit http://www.savekidsresale. com to quickly send email letters to your representatives. Visit http://www.overlawyered.com for the BEST overall, ongoing, up-to-date coverage of what this terrible law is doing to small and micro businesses in this country.
- Cynthia Broockman , Virginia
Friday, March 6, 2009 2:28pm
I know the consignment store in our area had the same problem. However, they worked something out whereby they can continue selling children's clothes. The toys and other "gadgets" need to be certified (they cannot afford to do so), and so they don't have a lot of those in the store anymore. At least they can supply low income families with affordable children's clothes.
- Elaine Foster , Camp Hill
Friday, March 6, 2009 6:43pm
THANK YOU! This is one of the better features in what has been a very slow-to-cover on behalf of WE the people, parents and business owners of America. THANKS!!!
While CPSIA was signed by Bush, it went through Congress and all but I think FOUR signed it. Also, if you stop by my blog, you'll see two links to the Obama documents that offer some more explanation - http://www.tristansepinion.blogspot.com
As a mompreneur who cares about our children, environment and economy - the direction in which our country is headed with OUR children, I am deeply disturbed by the implications of CPSIA. It has effectively replaced "Mother Approved" with "Big Brother Approved" and nullified our authority as both citizens and parents. I say this not only because of its Draconian measures (NO common sense) but because I believe that ANY LAW that taken an entire NATION by surprise cannot possibly have been born of the will of WE the PEOPLE.
Henry Waxman has repeatedly been asked to hear our voice - to amend CPSIA. Currently he and others are turning a deaf ear to those representatives who ARE trying (DeMint, Barton, etc.) to get our voice heard. The tail is wagging the dog - our country was not built on this top-down idea of power.
I just have to add - won't the "toxics" being ordered into our landfills one day seep into our ground water? And one of the chemicals used to "replace" phthalates (according to an NPR story) is known to cause kidney damage in rats. And why are our cars, carpets, kitchen utensils and all other things NOT included in CPSIA (it targets only children's indusry when our kids spend as much time, if not more, on our carpets, furniture, in our cars, etc.!)? And where is the evidence of the EPIDEMIC of lead poisonings that compels such a Draconian law? I haven't read any other stories but the few large manufactured products imported from China w/lead paint issues (very few!). Lead poisoning cases seem to be more the result of industrial factors than related to toys and kids products so WHY is our government targeting the latter? There's so much hypocrisy in this law it's not even funny. What I really want to know is, how is any of this BETTER for OUR children / environment? How is it BETTER for OUR children that we moms, small businesses, etc. across America (hardest hit are handmade, etc.) are effectively being put out of work - turfed into a MASS GRAVE at a time when our economy needs us to be WORKING, not dying off?
I hope more Americans will decide that being a GOOD AMERICAN means asking these questions and more. I hope more will call their representatives and express that they wish their COMMON SENSE and WILL be addressed by their public servants.
Thank you for this great featue. We need more like this one!
- Tristan Benz , Washington
Sunday, March 8, 2009 8:22pm
This very inconsiderate and un-thought-out law about the Thrift stores and the lead containing items being thrown into the landfills makes NO SENSE at all!!!!!!! There is a sign on the Martha's closet consignment store that says they had to close immediately, and would not accept or sell anything! That was the nicest and most well-run store of that kind that I've ever had the pleasure of shopping in, and I've been in many. And the 2 Thrift shops! How will they get through this? Those stores give so much back to the Island! What a complete waste!! In the last 6 months, since the economy worsened, I know people who are donating AND buying in the thrift and consignment stores, who never would have before. A service so needed here, and everywhere. Please contact all the politicians you can, to try to at least amend this law.
Couldn't you put a sign in the stores saying "Buy and use items AT YOUR OWN RISK!"?
The dumptique will be busier than ever, but then maybe they'll have to close,too.
- Debbie Magnuson , West Tisbury
Thursday, March 12, 2009 9:14am
What about the stores where all these second-hand items were bought (Toys-R-Us,Macy's, etc)- will they have to shut down also? Is this how the governmenbt is going to help our economy?
- Shirley W. Mayhew , West Tisbury
© 2010 Vineyard Gazette